Guest follow-up for churches, live in 14 days.
Agents prepare the work. A named person on your team approves it. Then it goes out. Nothing is sent in your church’s name until a staffer says yes.
Led by David Horton, who runs this kind of stack for a multi-campus church every week. Every system shown below is one we built and run ourselves.
Someone filled in a connect card on Sunday. By Wednesday nobody can say whose job it was to call. This is the workflow that closes that gap: every guest assigned to a staffer, overdue follow-ups surfaced, and nothing reaching a guest until a named staffer approves it. It runs on the church management system and giving tools you already pay for.
Start where the climb makes sense. Each offer is fixed in scope, has a finish line, and leaves you with something running. We do not take open-ended projects.
One workflow, built in two weeks and handed over with a runbook. For churches we package it as guest follow-up, live in 14 days. For other teams, lead intake to CRM to follow-up is the common first pick.
An assistant trained on your own material, for staff or for the people you serve, with guardrails and a handover to a person. Sold attached to a sprint, not on its own.
Agents and automations handle the daily operational work. Anything sent, published or paid waits for the right person on your team to approve it.
Founding rates are open to our first three clients, in exchange for a published case study. Three clients, then the standard price is the only price.
Work arrives where it already does. An agent prepares it. A named person on your team approves it. Only then does it go out.
An AI operations team is our monthly offer, and the step after guest follow-up for churches. We install the agents and automations, connect them to the tools you already use, and keep them running.
If you want something smaller first, start with a two-week automation sprint.
We run Altura on this setup. Agents research prospects, draft outreach and plan the week. David approves anything that gets sent.
Work starts where it already arrives: a form, an inbox, a calendar, a payment.
Agents do the preparation: research, first drafts, summaries, matching records.
A named person sees a short queue and approves, edits or rejects. Nothing is sent or paid without it.
Once approved, automations do the doing: send the message, update the CRM, create the task.
The offers above come from systems already running in production, built and operated by us. Each write-up covers the problem, the build and how it runs today.
We have no client case studies yet, and we would rather say so than borrow someone else’s logo. The work above is ours. Client write-ups will be added here as engagements finish, with permission.
The offers are the same. The workflows, the vocabulary and the sensitivities differ, so each has its own page.
Small staff, a lot of people to care for, and records split across a church management system, a giving platform and several inboxes.
Agencies, consultancies, clinics, and law and accounting firms, where billable people lose hours to intake, chasing and copy-paste. We take these on by referral.
Twenty minutes, no pitch deck. Describe the task your team dreads and we will tell you whether it can be automated, which offer fits, or that automation is the wrong answer.